SOAP::Lite (Anonymous Monk)

SOAP::Lite

created: 2006-04-16 14:22:36

perlmonks

node
author

prlmnks

node
author

Not good for any big deal, because of the restriction posed by the Perl language, but a easy and lquick way to test web services written in other languages, such like Java or .Net.

Considered by Old_Gray_Bear: Please Reap -- This is not a review, it's a polemic (and not a very good one at that).
Unconsidered by planetscape: keep (and edit) votes prevented reaping (keep: 10 edit: 1 reap: 29)

Re: SOAP::Lite

rjray

created: 2006-04-17 05:42:36

perlmonks

prlmnks

I have to disagree. It has its faults and limitations, but I've used it for clients and at my last job to do plenty of large-scale, high-volume web services work.

--rjray

Re: SOAP::Lite

SamCG

created: 2006-04-17 11:49:26

perlmonks

prlmnks

This is a review? This gives me virtually no useful information -- it's the opinion of an anonymous monk, without any backup in hard facts. Nothing about what's found lacking, why it's good for quick testing of web services, or why other languages might be better (not to mention that I don't really think of "module review" as the right place to do language considerations -- a particular module probably shouldn't be used to compare whole languages).

"the restriction posed by the Perl language": what restriction would this be?

-----------------
_{s''limp';@p=split '!','n!h!p!';s,m,s,;$s=y;$c=slice @p1;so brutally;d;$n=reverse;$c=$s**$#p;print(''.$c^chop($n))while($c/=$#p)>=1;}

Re^2: SOAP::Lite

rhesa

created: 2006-04-17 12:16:18

perlmonks

prlmnks

> "the restriction posed by the Perl language": what restriction would this be?

I'm assuming the fact that Perl doesn't have method signatures from which the relevant wsdl can be generated automatically. It may be an inconvenience here, but I don't believe the word "restriction" makes sense.

Other than that, I completely agree with you that this post does not constitute a review.