Jim Keenan
Also, why isn't it hosted at perl.org? Not hosting it at perl.org will also give the perception that it's a second-class citizen list, and you'll lose the NNTP and archival search services provided there. Did you even ask to have this at perl.org?
-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker
Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.
How is this different from module-authors@perl.org?
It's principal intended audience is much smaller: people who have taken over maintenance of CPAN modules from their original authors.
Not hosting it at perl.org will also give the perception that it's a second-class citizen list
At this point, I fully concede that it is a second-class citizen list -- because it hasn't proven itself. If people don't find it useful, its membership/readership will remain small and there will be no reason to host it at perl.org. If its readership grows, then transfer to a larger host would be worth considering.
I subscribe to several Perl lists which are not hosted at perl.org and, given their narrower focus, I think that's appropriate. There's More Than One Place to Host a Perl Mailing List.
Jim Keenan
I don't mind people reinventing the wheel, but let's first prove the existing wheel is lopsided.
-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker
Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.
Given that theres only about 2-3 messages per day in module-authors
Is that an alternate-universe module-authors? The one Im on has about that many in a week, on average. :-)
(Which means I see even less point to a new list specifically for maintainers. Thered be what, 2-3 messages quarter-yearly?)
Makeshifts last the longest.
-- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker
Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.
perlmonks.org content © perlmonks.org and Aristotle, jkeenan1, merlyn
prlmnks.org © 2006 edmund von der burg (eccles & toad)
v 0.03